Neat Video & Neat Image community

I don't have proper profiles for the 1D Mark III yet, but auto-profiling does a pretty good job nonetheless. Of course, it helps that the ISO 6400 images from this camera already look pretty good! :lol: http://www.flickr.com/photos/luxography/sets/72157600045242900/detail/ http://www.flickr.com/grou...

I think a big part of the Bible team, made a new soft and it is RSP.... I'm not sure what you mean by the "Bible" team (was Jesus involved? :lol:) but I think you meant the C1 software developers... they were the ones (or maybe it was just one guy) who split off to form Pixmantec and prod...

The same discussion is going on over on the Bibble forums too:

http://support.bibblelabs.com/webboard/ ... hp?p=15597

NeatImage 5.0 for Windows now automatically detects both CS and CS2 installation directories, and gives you the option to install in either or both.

Wow... it just keeps getting faster and faster! NeatImage 4.5, 15 images, ISO 1600: 29.8 megapixels/minute NeatImage 5.0, same 15 images: 53.6 megapixels/minute So not quite 2x, but a pretty big jump nonetheless! I found an old post of mine (" Benchmarking and hyperthreading ") where I sai...

Thanks for your reply, Andy. It's always nice to have more options when it comes to raw conversion software.

Very interesting! So PFS does not come with an embedded version of NI, but rather uses an existing install of NI to do the work? It also sounds like it uses NI on the converted image data, rather than working on the raw data before it is converted?

Ah, so I guess you don't need to be registered first to read posts (only create posts, I guess?). Damn spammers! *shakes fist*

Has anyone else noticed spam being addressed to the e-mail address they supplied when registering here on the forum? I've whitelisted that address at my end, to ensure that NI announcements are accidentally blocked. However, I received spam today with the subject "Well well well!" that was...

Anonymous wrote:IMAGE: 3504 x 2336 pixels - RAW
TIME: 1min 17sec

Ahhhh... I remember the days when it would take NI about nine minutes to process a 6-megapixel image from a D60 on my 800-MHz Pentium III laptop.

I'm surprised you even need to use NeatImage on your web-sized images. Shrinking at 20D image down that much (3500 pixels down to 500 pixels along one dimension) will drop out most of the noise anyway. However, I can tell you that NeatImage works superbly on my full-size 1D Mark II images (same size...

Leo,

Why not shoot a calibration target (following the directions provided in the documentation) at the same settings as your sky shot, and use that to develop a profile?

aglang wrote:So then the PC Photoshop plugin will no work in Photoshop on a MAC, correct?

Nope. Are there any plugins where the same file works on both a Windows machine and a Mac?

Great, I shall pass on the information. As usual, thanks for the speedy response!

I don't know if this has already been asked in one of the other forums, but if one buys the Windows version, is one entitled to use the Macintosh version as well? Or perhaps only have that as a "feature" of the Pro+ version? Or perhaps have a discount for those who need both Windows and Ma...