Search found 5 matches
- Mon Dec 15, 2003 12:22 am
- Forum: Improvements, new features
- Topic: Smaller noise-sampling rectangles?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 12038
The fine tune sample is a different story. Noise Ninja has a fixed size that is smaller than Neat Image's minimum. I'm not sure that this is as important, though, considering that someone can do an auto-fine tune. But I guess it would it would offer some advantage if it could be smaller and this wo...
- Thu Dec 11, 2003 11:10 pm
- Forum: Improvements, new features
- Topic: Smaller noise-sampling rectangles?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 12038
- Thu Dec 11, 2003 12:24 am
- Forum: Improvements, new features
- Topic: Smaller noise-sampling rectangles?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 12038
Smaller noise-sampling rectangles?
Please, please, please...isn't there a way to have a width of fewer than 60 pixels still work in the noise analysis process? Sometimes the worst noise in my images is in the shadow areas where I have pulled the detail out using Shadow/Highlights in Photoshop CS. I seldom have imges at all with large...
- Wed Dec 10, 2003 11:54 pm
- Forum: Device noise profiles
- Topic: Profiling and Shadow/Highlight command
- Replies: 1
- Views: 5606
Profiling and Shadow/Highlight command
I am going to be making a set of D60 profiles using the NI profile target. However, many of my shots are exposed for highlights, with the lower midtones and shadow areas underexposed by 1, 2, or even 3 stops. I depend on Photoshop CS Shadows/Highlights command to pull the detail back out of the shad...
- Sat Jun 14, 2003 9:03 pm
- Forum: Improvements, new features
- Topic: Feedback on Equalizer Changes
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4982
Feedback on Equalizer Changes
I think NI is a wonderful program, and the upgrade to the Pro Plus version with the plugin is very useful. I have been using the equalizer to restrict noise reduction to the shadow areas, which works very nicely in saving more detail in the lighter areas. What I miss is the ability to see realtime c...