Hello, I downloaded and printed the .PNG calibration target, printed on a HP laser Colour printer, and they printed the grey scale patches with a light green hue background. Corel Draw prints true greys.
Is the NI target green?
Thanks
Search found 8 matches
- Wed Jul 09, 2003 3:38 pm
- Forum: General questions
- Topic: Caligration Target
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4750
- Tue Jul 08, 2003 10:52 pm
- Forum: Improvements, new features
- Topic: Clean Abort
- Replies: 1
- Views: 5019
Clean Abort
A clean method of aborting the filtration process after a lo---ng wait - other than Ctrl/Alt/Delete and wait for the close dialogue box. VOX
- Tue Jul 08, 2003 10:46 pm
- Forum: Improvements, new features
- Topic: Auto profile selection based on EXIF tags
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9767
- Tue Jul 08, 2003 7:54 pm
- Forum: General questions
- Topic: Home versus Pro Version
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8837
OK I've located my other post - sorry humble pie and you've explained about the preview mode! Still Can't understand why my Athlon is so slow. Im using Win98SE - is that bad for NI? I'll try win 2K see if that will help. One further question, is the rendering for both Noise and sharpness done in a s...
- Tue Jul 08, 2003 7:43 pm
- Forum: General questions
- Topic: Home versus Pro Version
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8837
Thanks, the reason I'm asking the question ( my earlier post didn't save for some reason) is that on an Athlon 1.2Ghz machine 520Mb RAM I'm getting a filter processing time of 7-8 Minutes for a 17Mb TIFF (6 Mpix) file. Camera file sizes will keep increasing, so that doesn't look good for the future ...
- Tue Jul 08, 2003 7:31 pm
- Forum: General questions
- Topic: Home versus Pro Version
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8837
- Tue Jul 08, 2003 10:24 am
- Forum: General questions
- Topic: Home versus Pro Version
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8837
Home versus Pro Version
Hi, Picking up on an earlier post 8Bit versus 16Bit in the old Forum. Does this mean since the Pro version only has 16Bit TIFF support that it will always process slower than the cheaper Home or demo software options? I'm getting 7-10 minutes on the PRO version for a 17Mb 6Mpixel TIFF.
- Tue Jul 08, 2003 10:22 am
- Forum: Using Neat Image
- Topic: Slow Processing
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4982
Slow Processing
Hello, I'm just learning to use Neat Image and I'm sorry if this has already been discussed. The results of my tests so far show NI works really well. But I shoot 6Mpix images (2832 X 2128). In future we can expect image sizes to keep moving up. It's taking 7 minutes to filter one equivalent 17Mb TI...