Search found 3 matches
- Fri Jan 02, 2009 10:58 am
- Forum: Improvements, new features
- Topic: Automatic, non-rectangular area selection noise profiling
- Replies: 2
- Views: 19143
Thank you for your answer, Vlad. However, if Automatic Profiling was always the best possible way to profile the image, then there would be no actual need for the current implementation of manual profiling, either. This suggestion was meant as an alternative way for these manual profiling scenarios,...
- Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:09 pm
- Forum: Improvements, new features
- Topic: Automatic, non-rectangular area selection noise profiling
- Replies: 2
- Views: 19143
Automatic, non-rectangular area selection noise profiling
I know that similar suggestions have been made in the past, but bear with me. The basic idea would be to let the user select, with a lasso-type tool, several/most/all of the areas of an image containing only noise (and thus usable for per-image-based noise profiling). From previous answers to this, ...
- Thu Dec 25, 2008 6:58 pm
- Forum: General questions
- Topic: Which noise filtration software is the most popular?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 11623
Re: Which noise filtration software is the most popular?
... user number is the most objective measure of quality That would fall almost squarely under the definition of the argumentum ad populum logical fallacy; the popularity of an idea doesn't necessarily imply (much less prove) its truth, and indeed this is quite often not the case. I've tested sever...