Neat Video & Neat Image community

I have seen in the new update 7.3 png is now supported.

Thank you for improving Neat image

Hello, I still miss it. It is anoying to convert my png to bitmap just to open them in neat image. Later i delete these bitmaps again, i have no need for bitmaps. PNG has the advantage of lossless compression, that's why i use it since 13 years :-) Are there some news for the PNG support in Neat Ima...

I want PNG Also, i used it now for 10 about years now I have an idea for this, in general not only for PNG, also for JPEG without EXIF Data: A new feature could be if there is now Data that the User could select a "Sample" File from which Neat takes the Exif information OR the User could m...

Yes, i have noticed that. Thank you it is really great.

Thank You for adding the quality-tag feature in neat image 7.0 !!!
that is really great, it saves a lot of time for example:
manual profiling+ renaming the profiles: 2 Hours
the same stack in Batchmode about 1,5 Minutes!
i will update in june

THX++

Ok, Do you mean 7.1 ?

greets

Ah, that is the reason, i guess the Profile expects calibration targets, i profiled regular images like it is possible with the manual method. It is possible to update this in a Future Version of Neat image to choose in the Batch Profiler between Calibration Target and Regular Image (maybe a checkbo...

Hello, i have found a second bug in the Profiling workflow. I had done this: At first i loaded an image and pushed the "Autoprofile" Button. Neat image said profile Quality is 93%. When i use the Batch Profiler, the Image was profiled with 41% profilequality! Also the noise sample is very ...

Ok, thanks or the answer. My main problem is that there is no possibillity to see the Quality of a profile file without to open the file (all other things like ISO , Shutterspeed an d others are in the file name.) And the quality of a Profile is the most important parameter of all, so i think there ...

Dear NI-team i am really dissapointed that i didnt get an answer, it is now 19 Months (!) ago, and i still need a feature like a small Q-Tag in the Profilename. I am sure this is usefull also for other users and really easy to do with a tiny variable/codepiece. I also said i Update to Pro when u cou...

usually someone who want to buy a camera reads magazine with tests, but if you dont trust these test like i do here is my tip for you: Take a flashcard (you should know which memory these cameras want i guess SD or SDHC Cards) and go to your nearest Camera dealer 1 or 2 Shoots with these 2 cameras w...

Hello NiTeam it is now about 8 months ago, and i want to ask if it is posibbe that this feature (i mean the Quality-Tag at the end of the FileName) could be implemented in future (maybe in 6.2 or 6.3) because i still needed very much, and i think it should be not so difficult to implement this featu...

Ok, i just asked because i read the user manual where the steps of manual adjustment is described.

i have calculatet that to make profile for every thinkable set i could produce about 29700 Profiles, because each factor multiplies the possibilities. For example 5 different Iso settings, about 33 shutterspeeds (under 1sec), 9 White-balance Settings, 5 Image Sizes 4 De-Noise-Filer settings offcours...

yes i know, but the fintune analyse often produce measurements over and under 5% steps. So when i like to manual profile with 5%-steps it doesn't reach the accuracy which is needed. Maybe this could be feature suggestion?: when the user hold the "Control(Ctr)"-Button the sliders move in 1%...