Search found 6 matches
- Wed Aug 24, 2011 1:42 am
- Forum: Using Neat Image
- Topic: New version 7.0 lower quality profiles
- Replies: 7
- Views: 24803
Thank you for the explanation and the time to test it. I performed several tests on different films scanned with the Coolscan 9000 and it seems like version 6.1 preserves more detail while reducing noise similarly. This could be just for the Coolscan since it captures more detail than flatbed; where...
- Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:50 pm
- Forum: Using Neat Image
- Topic: New version 7.0 lower quality profiles
- Replies: 7
- Views: 24803
- Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:49 pm
- Forum: Using Neat Image
- Topic: New version 7.0 lower quality profiles
- Replies: 7
- Views: 24803
- Sun Aug 21, 2011 2:44 pm
- Forum: Using Neat Image
- Topic: New version 7.0 lower quality profiles
- Replies: 7
- Views: 24803
Here is the full scan for those interested to test it:
http://shutterclick.smugmug.com/Photogr ... cGpJF-O-LB
http://shutterclick.smugmug.com/Photogr ... cGpJF-O-LB
- Sun Aug 21, 2011 2:33 pm
- Forum: Using Neat Image
- Topic: New version 7.0 lower quality profiles
- Replies: 7
- Views: 24803
Example
This is an example of Kodak Portra 400 processed with both versions of Neatimage.
http://shutterclick.smugmug.com/Photogr ... nMwwx-O-LB
I hope this problem in the algorithm to generate the profile gets fixed soon.
http://shutterclick.smugmug.com/Photogr ... nMwwx-O-LB
I hope this problem in the algorithm to generate the profile gets fixed soon.
- Sun Aug 21, 2011 2:03 pm
- Forum: Using Neat Image
- Topic: New version 7.0 lower quality profiles
- Replies: 7
- Views: 24803
New version 7.0 lower quality profiles
I have performed several test on scanned film (Coolscan 9000) and the new version 7.0 produces materially inferior results than version 6.1. This is most noticeably on people faces or fine textures in clothing where version 6.1 does an excellent job retaining detail but version 7.0 produces a smeare...