Search found 7 matches
- Fri Jul 27, 2012 4:01 pm
- Forum: Device noise profiles
- Topic: Fine-Tuning Decreases Profile Quality
- Replies: 1
- Views: 18126
Fine-Tuning Decreases Profile Quality
Sometimes fine-tuning decreases profile quality. For example, I get 96% quality with Auto-Profiling but it becomes 94% after fine-tuning and sometimes less. Must I use the original one without fine-tuning with higher quality or fine-tuned one with less quality? Also, here's an image of such a profil...
- Thu Nov 03, 2011 2:37 pm
- Forum: Device noise profiles
- Topic: Using Regular Image to Create Profiles
- Replies: 8
- Views: 26980
- Wed Nov 02, 2011 5:09 pm
- Forum: Device noise profiles
- Topic: Using Regular Image to Create Profiles
- Replies: 8
- Views: 26980
- Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:17 pm
- Forum: Device noise profiles
- Topic: Using Regular Image to Create Profiles
- Replies: 8
- Views: 26980
- Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:55 am
- Forum: Device noise profiles
- Topic: Using Regular Image to Create Profiles
- Replies: 8
- Views: 26980
- Tue Nov 01, 2011 2:54 pm
- Forum: Device noise profiles
- Topic: Using Regular Image to Create Profiles
- Replies: 8
- Views: 26980
Using Regular Image to Create Profiles
Why are we using calibration target instead of a regular image when creating a noise profile? What will we lose if we use regular image? For example when creating a profile set for my machine, for a profile, I get %78 quality with calibration target (I know, I can improve it.). With a regular image ...
- Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:35 am
- Forum: Device noise profiles
- Topic: Noise Profiles for Canon PowerShot SX120 IS
- Replies: 1
- Views: 17612
Noise Profiles for Canon PowerShot SX120 IS
I've made 44 noise profiles with different combinations for Canon SX120. I used automatic white balance for all. Overall profile quality isn't too good (about 70-80%). I hope nothing is wrong. For ISO:80,100,200,400,800,1600 and 1/25 1/30 1/40 .... 1/250. Source image files were 3648 x 2736 pixels. ...