Search found 5 matches

by mr_ianashton
Sat Jul 08, 2017 8:53 am
Forum: General questions
Topic: Build your own profiles?
Replies: 3
Views: 8381

adding shooting conditions to the equation is adding a lot of parameters. I guess I could end up with many dozens of profiles for one camera. Has anyone done this and found it worthwhile, would you know? If I were to do it, then clearly all the isos have to have their own category. But what about sh...
by mr_ianashton
Sat Jul 01, 2017 5:36 pm
Forum: General questions
Topic: Build your own profiles?
Replies: 3
Views: 8381

Build your own profiles?

I imagine this has been asked before, but for a given camera (I don`t mean say the Panasonic GH4 as a model, but the particular GH4 in my hand) will a noise pattern at a given iso and shutter speed be consistently the same such that I can apply my own Neat Video profiles? I ask because it is sometim...
by mr_ianashton
Sun Oct 26, 2014 8:52 pm
Forum: General questions
Topic: Use NV on full image size?
Replies: 4
Views: 6044

thank you for your quick reply Vlad.

That settles it for me then. Smaller it is.
by mr_ianashton
Sun Oct 26, 2014 8:20 pm
Forum: General questions
Topic: Use NV on full image size?
Replies: 4
Views: 6044

Hello Vad, This question came up in my mind again today. I think what I`m asking is - in a complex, "busy" image with few uniform areas, NV presumably has a better chance of finding a uniform area of adequate pixels using an image with more pixels. But will this translate to a more accurat...
by mr_ianashton
Sun Oct 13, 2013 7:43 am
Forum: General questions
Topic: Use NV on full image size?
Replies: 4
Views: 6044

Use NV on full image size?

I do a lot of time lapse work, with individual raw stills at 5472 x 3648 pixels. These are first worked in Photoshop where I export to tif at 1920 x 1080. I use After Effects to work the tifs to a final clip. Neat Video is making me rethink this workflow. Would it be fair to say that the more pixels...