Search found 13 matches

by Spire
Fri Apr 25, 2008 3:16 pm
Forum: Using Neat Image
Topic: Neat Image 4.0: Filtration masks missing in Component Viewer
Replies: 8
Views: 12477

Thanks for your reply. I suspected as much, but it's a pity that this feature is gone for good.
by Spire
Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:45 am
Forum: Using Neat Image
Topic: Neat Image 4.0: Filtration masks missing in Component Viewer
Replies: 8
Views: 12477

I'm normally loath to bump feature-request threads, but it's been over four years and I've been waiting patiently all this time for some good news.

Is there any chance that the Component Viewer will be coming back in the foreseeable future?
by Spire
Mon May 28, 2007 8:41 pm
Forum: General questions
Topic: Neat Image and Photoshop CS3
Replies: 6
Views: 11256

Excellent news!

Do you have a rough ETA on the release of the new version?

I am willing to help test any beta versions, in case you can use help.
by Spire
Mon May 07, 2007 4:17 am
Forum: General questions
Topic: Neat Image and Photoshop CS3
Replies: 6
Views: 11256

I have no information about support for smart filters yet. Any news on this? I've been dying to be able to use Neat Image as a Smart Filter. I haven't looked at any of the new Photoshop CS3 SDK material yet, but I did find this little tidbit on this John Nack blog post : On a related note, develope...
by Spire
Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:35 pm
Forum: Using Neat Image
Topic: Any advantage to saving as TIFF
Replies: 4
Views: 7396

There will always be a difference, even with the Quality set to 100% for the JPEG output; that's just the way lossy compression works. Whether the difference is small enough to justify the savings in file size is something only you can decide. So how do you decide? Well, here's a handy trick that mi...
by Spire
Wed Feb 21, 2007 3:45 am
Forum: Using Neat Image
Topic: Any advantage to saving as TIFF
Replies: 4
Views: 7396

There is an advantage in terms of image quality, since JPEG is lossy while TIFF is lossless. How much of an advantage? It depends on the Quality setting that you have selected at the time that you save the filtered JPEG file. At the same time, there is a disadvantage in terms of file size. For photo...
by Spire
Wed Jun 22, 2005 7:40 pm
Forum: Improvements, new features
Topic: Hyperthreading and dual processor support
Replies: 17
Views: 62422

I should have mentioned that my system is a true dual-processor machine (Athlon MP 2800+). I have to say that the speed improvements you have been able to achieve with each new version of Neat Image are simply staggering, and immensely appreciated. My investment in Neat Image just keeps on giving. I...
by Spire
Wed Jun 22, 2005 6:26 pm
Forum: Improvements, new features
Topic: Hyperthreading and dual processor support
Replies: 17
Views: 62422

I am still hoping for SMP/HT support while processing a single image. I'm not sure how difficult this would be, since it depends on the architecture of the application. I'm hoping that the implementation can be done relatively simply. It might even be as simple as dividing the image in half and proc...
by Spire
Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:54 am
Forum: Using Neat Image
Topic: Suggestion for Profile building selection
Replies: 6
Views: 8627

I hope you'll consider adding this useful feature to the Windows version as well. Thanks, and sorry again for the off-topic Windows tangent here.
by Spire
Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:20 am
Forum: Using Neat Image
Topic: Suggestion for Profile building selection
Replies: 6
Views: 8627

Actually, I'm using the Windows version. My apologies; I didn't notice that this thread was in the Mac subforum.

I still cannot find a way to resize the selection; dragging the border merely moves the entire selection. Is this currently a Mac-only feature?
by Spire
Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:14 am
Forum: Using Neat Image
Topic: Suggestion for Profile building selection
Replies: 6
Views: 8627

I would also find it very useful to be able to resize a selection by dragging on the selection border. This is especially important during manual profiling, since fine adjustments often have to be made to the selection in order to obtain a suitably flat area. It's tedious to have to reselect the ent...
by Spire
Tue Apr 06, 2004 12:12 am
Forum: Using Neat Image
Topic: Neat Image 4.0: Filtration masks missing in Component Viewer
Replies: 8
Views: 12477

Thank you for your very prompt and informative response. I do realize that the before-and-after comparison is still available in the Component Viewer, and for that I am thankful. However, as to your opinion that this feature is more useful than the filtration masks, I must respectfully disagree. My ...
by Spire
Mon Apr 05, 2004 10:48 pm
Forum: Using Neat Image
Topic: Neat Image 4.0: Filtration masks missing in Component Viewer
Replies: 8
Views: 12477

Neat Image 4.0: Filtration masks missing in Component Viewer

After spending a few minutes playing around with Neat Image 4.0, I must both congratulate and thank ABSoft for the remarkable improvement in speed that I've observed. On one test image I tried, processing time went from 125 seconds in Neat Image 3.17 all the way down to 55 seconds in 4.0; that's 227...