Search found 11 matches

by sonics
Tue Mar 24, 2009 3:11 pm
Forum: General questions
Topic: NeatAudio?
Replies: 13
Views: 17019

With adobe audition you can achieve a lot considering audio denoising.

There is a free audio editing program as well but I don't have experience with it: http://audacity.sourceforge.net/
by sonics
Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:24 pm
Forum: Bugs, problems, issues
Topic: XP with CS3 is faster than vista with CS4?
Replies: 13
Views: 13866

Q9450 3.3GHz, XP32, Pr CS4.0.1, 1440x1080 25p, 15 sec, filtered by NV (rad 1), encoded into h264: 4 min 55 sec Vlad with vbr 1-pass I did the same one in 5 min 48 That is 18% faster since your q9450 is more overclocked than mine (running 3% faster + 3% more bandwith) it would mean that the 6M more ...
by sonics
Mon Mar 23, 2009 6:15 pm
Forum: Bugs, problems, issues
Topic: XP with CS3 is faster than vista with CS4?
Replies: 13
Views: 13866

NVTeam wrote:Q9450 3.3GHz, XP32, Pr CS4.0.1, 1440x1080 25p, 15 sec, filtered by NV (rad 1), encoded into h264: 4 min 55 sec

Vlad
VBR 1 pass?
by sonics
Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:55 am
Forum: Bugs, problems, issues
Topic: XP with CS3 is faster than vista with CS4?
Replies: 13
Views: 13866

NVTeam wrote:
BTW, I think Q9450 would better (than Q9400) cope with the bandwidth problem thanks to its two times larger L2 cache.

Vlad
How fast does your Q9450 render a HDV clip? Is it a big difference or like 10-15% compared to the Q9400?
by sonics
Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:27 pm
Forum: Bugs, problems, issues
Topic: XP with CS3 is faster than vista with CS4?
Replies: 13
Views: 13866

Perhaps the encoding really needs some of the new processor instructions available in Q9400 but not available in E6400, while NV doesn't need/use them. The most important parameters for NV to run faster are processor speed and memory bandwidth. Well I had a 2.66Ghz dual core, now a 3.2 Ghz quadcore...
by sonics
Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:36 am
Forum: Bugs, problems, issues
Topic: XP with CS3 is faster than vista with CS4?
Replies: 13
Views: 13866

Today I upgraded to a Q9400 and put it on 3.2 Ghz In theory it should be 120% faster than my E6400 2.66 Ghz It showed some interesting results: Neat video rendering were around 72% faster H264 encoding (no filters) were around 130% faster somehow when rendering the work area in CS3 / 4 neatvideo doe...
by sonics
Sat Mar 21, 2009 6:09 pm
Forum: Bugs, problems, issues
Topic: XP with CS3 is faster than vista with CS4?
Replies: 13
Views: 13866

The update from cs4.00 to cs4.01 did some good. I did all tests now: 1440x1080 clip 15 sec neat video rendering XP32 + CS3.20 5 min 50 xp32 + CS4.01 6 min 05 vista64 + CS3.20 5 min 56 vista64 + CS4.01 6 min 29 1440 x 1080 H264 rendering showed similar results (1 min 40 clip no filters) XP32 + CS3.20...
by sonics
Tue Mar 17, 2009 6:42 pm
Forum: Bugs, problems, issues
Topic: XP with CS3 is faster than vista with CS4?
Replies: 13
Views: 13866

XP with CS3 is faster than vista with CS4?

I own an E6400 @ 2.6Ghz With windows XP 32 bit with premiere CS3.20 I rendered a 10 second 1440x1080 clip with temp filter 1 and adaptive 1 I did the same with windows vista 64 bit with premiere CS4.00 result: XP 32 -> CS3 : 4 minutes 16 seconds Vista 64 -> CS4 : 5 minutes 46 seconds How can this be...
by sonics
Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:40 am
Forum: Bugs, problems, issues
Topic: weird aspect ratio
Replies: 1
Views: 4264

weird aspect ratio

I'm using neat video with premiere 2.0

When editing a DV-PAL clip (pixel aspect 1:1,067) the clip is shown in wide format when in the neatvideo box, and normal again when leaving neat video.

I have a sample when clicking the link.
What is the reason for this?

screenshot

thanks, [/url]
by sonics
Mon Feb 16, 2009 10:34 pm
Forum: Using Neat Video
Topic: a bit blurry
Replies: 5
Views: 10910

I tried another clip. I made it with my HV20 in low light conditions and made a 100% crop out of it till I got 640x480 1:33 aspect ratio to meet the demo requirements. The result is way better than my 1st attempt. I could make a profile without warnings as well. The last 2 seconds with the black dog...
by sonics
Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:17 pm
Forum: Using Neat Video
Topic: a bit blurry
Replies: 5
Views: 10910

a bit blurry

I am trying the demo version on premiere with some noisy clips made on a compact camera with 640x480 clips indoors. (my camcorder is a HV20) When profiling my example I couldnt make a noise profile without warnings like R clipping, or area not uniform in Y channel. The clip was quite "red"...