Neat Video & Neat Image community

I had tried manual profiling with the sliders, but the proble is - the sliders could only be moved in 5%-steps, is there a trick to move them in 1%-steps?

I have readed the documentation before, but had forgotten that detail. In the documentation is written a profile quality higher than 75% is good, i aim a quality of 91%-100% (usually 93-96%), so thats no the problem i used "auto profile with regular image" on calibration targets. In the fu...

oh, i found it i used always the function "auto profile with regular image",
when i made the profile with calibration targets, is that very bad?

Do you use Auto Profile with Regular Image or Auto Profile with Calibration Target (please see in the Profile menu)? In this example i mean i used the Caliration Target. But i use also regular images if they produce high quality Profiles. That happens for example in images with low deph field sharp...

Hello i am actually making a set for the Olympus e-420 which isn't allready fully listed (only raw) i have aquestion to better understand the profiling: 1. i make a profile with a target for example, the auto profiler chooses a place in the right upper corner on a bright square, and i save this the ...

yes i need to explain, i keep offcourse only the high quality profiles, BUT i figured out that several times i need more than 1 profile for a special task, because even if all attributes which neat mesures (camera,iso,shutter,wb) 2 or 3 files are in the name and quality the same but only 1 or 2 matc...

I would say, i also like to see png support for neat.
i use png as my standart fileformat for lossless images a lot.
It has the best lossless and native compression algorythm i.e.

I want to update my suggestion, i think the quality-tag should stand at the and of the filename like this E-420 (ISO800; SharpNormal; 3648x2736; WB code (14); 1by400s; Q096 ).dnp and should look like Qxxx / for example Q096 (and not Q96) I am make actually a profile set by hand and i added the Q-Tag...

Hello, i think i found a bug in the function of the "Auto Match Profile" in NeatImage. When i have load an image an i use the "Auto Match Profile" function with a profile Set which has several Profiles which would match for that image, because all parameters are right, Neat just ...

thank you,
i would update my licence from home to pro if you could improve the batchprofiler.

greets

Hello, i wanted to make profiles in a batch, it works BUT not i need an option to make profiles only if the quality is for example at least 90%. (otherwise don't make a profile) Because i figured out in neat every percent counts for quality. The second problem is there is no way to manage in or outs...

yeah,
i would like png support to
PNG rocks