Neat Video & Neat Image community

I mean, if I use the same RAM I have now, I won't get any speed improvements if I get a much faster CPU? I have i7 920 now.

Ok and to be clear, if I got say a i7 4770 rather than my first generation i7 which is twice as slower, would I get twice the speed with NV (using the same RAM I have now)?

Ok but what does fast RAM mean? RW speed or latency?

But you said RAM is my bottleneck and that higher resolutions will use more cores but this did not happen.
If I do need faster RAM, can you be specific? What do I need faster, RAM read/write speed or lower latency?

Why 240p to 5? Why not 4 or 6?
You tell me to increase to higher resolution than 1080p? I'll try.
I have 4 real cores but 8 hyperthreaded.

Both 240p and 1080p fail to use all 8 of my cores so what's missing here?

If even 320x240 fails to use all 8 of my cores, why would 1920x1080 be any better? 1080p also doesn't use more than 6 cores.

No, 240p does not use all 8 cores. I have tried it. It would be interesting to know if there is a resolution that can take up all 8 of my cores though.

I remember Vlad always suggesting not better CPU but faster RAM. I tested my RAM with some benchmarks and it compared well with others on the list including very expensive ones. Here are my results http://i39.tinypic.com/a084f7.png I can only use 5 of the cores of my cpu now before speed stops incre...

Ok but it's true that lower the frame size the less memory need be used, right? If so why did I get this on testing a 64x64 frame: CPU only (1 core): 500 frames/sec CPU only (2 cores): 76.9 frames/sec CPU only (3 cores): 62.5 frames/sec CPU only (4 cores): 62.5 frames/sec CPU only (5 cores): 66.7 fr...

jpsdr that doesn't explain me because a car has only 4 tires but a video has 100,000 frames or more so theres lots of opportunity for more cores. NVTeam, I have 4GB memory but since I have XP its only 3. With 240x160 video it would be 115KB per frame and 2.7MB per second. With 6 cores it processes t...

Indeed there are, and a lower rating but the picture noise profile itself is the same. This would still make denoising less effective?

Then how do I fix noise profiles in photoshop?

No they are exactly the same. One is just taken from the full frame and other is profiled from only the screenshot of the noise profile.

But this happens with very small 160p videos too. Are you sure its a memory problem?

But why jams? You maybe cache 80 frames and have each core denoise 10, 13 with 6, so where does jams come from?