After a while the optimal settings differt a lot.
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 7:10 pm
Hi,
I use the V3.4 and have this computer setup:
I7-2600K (OC at 4.6 Ghz).
GTX 760
GTX 570
I run the test to get the "optimal" settings. I encode the video (25-30 minutes with JUST the Neat video apply to it). It's slow (2-3 hours), I expected this. I came back later on it's at 24-25% and now it's nearly 20+ hours!.
I cancel the encoding, go back into the Neat video plugin, re-run the optimize button and now the results are totally different. I re-run the same encoding and now 3-4 hours later it's done.
The main difference was that in the INITIAL Optimize testing, I was told to use 3 of my 8 cores. Second time it's 1 core only (If not, 2 cores and up, I pass from 1.5ish FPS to 0.3**FPS). Also on the second run the use of 1 GPU (regardless) or BOTH don't change a thing in the results (FPS).
Any reasons for this?
I use the V3.4 and have this computer setup:
I7-2600K (OC at 4.6 Ghz).
GTX 760
GTX 570
I run the test to get the "optimal" settings. I encode the video (25-30 minutes with JUST the Neat video apply to it). It's slow (2-3 hours), I expected this. I came back later on it's at 24-25% and now it's nearly 20+ hours!.
I cancel the encoding, go back into the Neat video plugin, re-run the optimize button and now the results are totally different. I re-run the same encoding and now 3-4 hours later it's done.
The main difference was that in the INITIAL Optimize testing, I was told to use 3 of my 8 cores. Second time it's 1 core only (If not, 2 cores and up, I pass from 1.5ish FPS to 0.3**FPS). Also on the second run the use of 1 GPU (regardless) or BOTH don't change a thing in the results (FPS).
Any reasons for this?