FCPX GTX 980 slower than GTX 660 TI
Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 5:16 am
Hy,
im running an E-Gpu with an ViDock enclosure over 1x PCIE lane on my Macbook Pro.
Since NeatVideo is not supporting my Internal Intel Iris Pro 5200 i got this enclosure together with GTX 660 TI to speed up rendering on FCPX.
It was run stable for about 1 Week.
I hoped to get better results with an GTX 980 Card, so i upgraded, but now i got much worse results.
Log:
Frame Size: 1280x720 progressive
Bitdepth: 32 bits per channel
Quality Mode: Normal
Mix with Original: Disabled
Temporal Filter: Enabled
Radius: 5 frames
Dust and Scratches: Aggressive
Slow Shutter: Disabled
Spatial Filter: Enabled
Frequencies: High, Mid, Low
Artifact Removal: Enabled
Edge Smoothing: Disabled
Sharpening: Disabled
Neat Video 4.1.4 Pro plug-in for Final Cut
Detecting the best combination of performance settings:
running the test data set on up to 8 CPU cores and on up to 1 GPU
GeForce GTX 980: 3629 MB currently available (4095 MB total), using up to 100%
CPU only (1 core): 1.45 frames/sec
CPU only (2 cores): 3.34 frames/sec
CPU only (3 cores): 4.67 frames/sec
CPU only (4 cores): 5.75 frames/sec
CPU only (5 cores): 5.81 frames/sec
CPU only (6 cores): 5.99 frames/sec
CPU only (7 cores): 6.02 frames/sec
CPU only (8 cores): 6.06 frames/sec
GPU only (GeForce GTX 980): 1.46 frames/sec
CPU (1 core) and GPU (GeForce GTX 980): 1.35 frames/sec
CPU (2 cores) and GPU (GeForce GTX 980): 2.82 frames/sec
CPU (3 cores) and GPU (GeForce GTX 980): 3.85 frames/sec
CPU (4 cores) and GPU (GeForce GTX 980): 4.08 frames/sec
CPU (5 cores) and GPU (GeForce GTX 980): 4.12 frames/sec
CPU (6 cores) and GPU (GeForce GTX 980): 4.1 frames/sec
CPU (7 cores) and GPU (GeForce GTX 980): 4.12 frames/sec
CPU (8 cores) and GPU (GeForce GTX 980): 4.13 frames/sec
Best combination: CPU only (8 cores)
With GTX 660 TI and same Nvidia Webdrivers and same Cuda Drivers i got whit 5 Cores + EGPU about 6,5 frames/sec.
Webdrivers Version: 10.11.10 (346.03.10f02)
Cuda Version: 7.5.29.
Do i forgot something to setup or are the 6xx Cards faster on NeatVideo than the 9xx?
Best regards
Tom
im running an E-Gpu with an ViDock enclosure over 1x PCIE lane on my Macbook Pro.
Since NeatVideo is not supporting my Internal Intel Iris Pro 5200 i got this enclosure together with GTX 660 TI to speed up rendering on FCPX.
It was run stable for about 1 Week.
I hoped to get better results with an GTX 980 Card, so i upgraded, but now i got much worse results.
Log:
Frame Size: 1280x720 progressive
Bitdepth: 32 bits per channel
Quality Mode: Normal
Mix with Original: Disabled
Temporal Filter: Enabled
Radius: 5 frames
Dust and Scratches: Aggressive
Slow Shutter: Disabled
Spatial Filter: Enabled
Frequencies: High, Mid, Low
Artifact Removal: Enabled
Edge Smoothing: Disabled
Sharpening: Disabled
Neat Video 4.1.4 Pro plug-in for Final Cut
Detecting the best combination of performance settings:
running the test data set on up to 8 CPU cores and on up to 1 GPU
GeForce GTX 980: 3629 MB currently available (4095 MB total), using up to 100%
CPU only (1 core): 1.45 frames/sec
CPU only (2 cores): 3.34 frames/sec
CPU only (3 cores): 4.67 frames/sec
CPU only (4 cores): 5.75 frames/sec
CPU only (5 cores): 5.81 frames/sec
CPU only (6 cores): 5.99 frames/sec
CPU only (7 cores): 6.02 frames/sec
CPU only (8 cores): 6.06 frames/sec
GPU only (GeForce GTX 980): 1.46 frames/sec
CPU (1 core) and GPU (GeForce GTX 980): 1.35 frames/sec
CPU (2 cores) and GPU (GeForce GTX 980): 2.82 frames/sec
CPU (3 cores) and GPU (GeForce GTX 980): 3.85 frames/sec
CPU (4 cores) and GPU (GeForce GTX 980): 4.08 frames/sec
CPU (5 cores) and GPU (GeForce GTX 980): 4.12 frames/sec
CPU (6 cores) and GPU (GeForce GTX 980): 4.1 frames/sec
CPU (7 cores) and GPU (GeForce GTX 980): 4.12 frames/sec
CPU (8 cores) and GPU (GeForce GTX 980): 4.13 frames/sec
Best combination: CPU only (8 cores)
With GTX 660 TI and same Nvidia Webdrivers and same Cuda Drivers i got whit 5 Cores + EGPU about 6,5 frames/sec.
Webdrivers Version: 10.11.10 (346.03.10f02)
Cuda Version: 7.5.29.
Do i forgot something to setup or are the 6xx Cards faster on NeatVideo than the 9xx?
Best regards
Tom