What aspect of Neat Video should be improved most?

suggest a way to improve Neat Video
Post Reply

What aspect of Neat Video would you like to see improved most?

Make it faster (but the keep the quality of noise reduction)
7
54%
Make it faster (even if quality is somewhat lower), as an option
0
No votes
Increase the quality (even if it becomes slower), as an option
3
23%
Make it more reliable / stable (to avoid crashes/hangs/etc)
0
No votes
Make the user interface more intuitive and simple
1
8%
Make profiling easier and more accurate
1
8%
Make filter settings simpler and easier to understand
0
No votes
Make applying the filter as a whole more automated
0
No votes
Improve documentation, training materials and the like
0
No votes
Another aspect: suggest one
1
8%
 
Total votes: 13

NVTeam
Posts: 2318
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:12 pm
Contact:

What aspect of Neat Video should be improved most?

Post by NVTeam » Mon Jul 03, 2017 12:56 pm

There are many aspects of Neat Video that can be improved as we continue to work on the product.
Which aspect is the most important from your point of view? Please let us know using this poll.

If you want to suggest a new option, please reply below.

If you want to discuss one or more of these above options or go into details on what can be improved and how,
please create a new topic in this section of the forum.

Thank you.

valleo
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:23 pm

Post by valleo » Wed Jul 05, 2017 7:07 am

The ability to remove fixed pattern noise via mask or painting.
And when I use DUST AND SCRATCH REMOVAL please add the ability to leave this from the global mix. So I can remove all dust and scratches but blend some noise over my footage.

valleo
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:23 pm

Post by valleo » Fri Aug 25, 2017 9:43 am

Most of the time working on clips I just need a quick solution to denoise because of time pressure. NV is able to do just fantastic results with a click on "Auto Profile". But what about placing this button above "Select to open"? This would be great. A quick denoise solution and beneath it the detailed solution for the high-end jobs.

DavidDoyle
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 11:00 am

Re: What aspect of Neat Video should be improved most?

Post by DavidDoyle » Tue Apr 17, 2018 8:00 am

Would defnitely support valleo's suggestion of simpler addition of NV to a clip, to make it seem more like part of FCPX than a separate product.

My main suggestion would be consideration on some supported configurations for eGPU usage, and how NV handles multiple GPU's (internal and external). There will be different bandwidth to each and some advice to users on the optimum configurations would be beneficial. In many cases for example, the use of a powerful eGPU would be worthless because of the bandwidth limitation / overhead of the interface.

Post Reply