I have some images exposed at 1600iso that I am working on.
I ran them through NI using auto profiling, then I edited and retouched them in cs2. I was still not real happy with my noise reduction on some(ran them in batch) thought about re-filtering the images without batch, but I have done retouching already and don't want to do that again....so...I ran the filtered & re-touched image thru NI again and looks like I got pleasing results, but I am scared of this "plastic" look I am reading about. I don't think they look plastic, but maybe they will when my lab prints them???
What are the recomendations for filtering this way? Am I hurting the image?
is it going to look to fake?
[/img]
filtering twice????
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:11 pm
- Location: East Lansing, MI
Getting back to the topic of filtering twice, what are your comments about that approach from a mathamatical/statistical viewpoint Vlad? Would a very noisy photo be better de-noised through two or more rounds of Neat Image, or can you do just as well in one pass?
An interesting question. Would details be preserved better with multiple passes?
An interesting question. Would details be preserved better with multiple passes?