Advantage of 16 bit processing?
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 7:51 pm
I use CS3 with both RAW and JPG images (mostly macro images) and generally work in 16 bit when possible.
I've been using the demo version of Neat Image for some time and am really pleased with the results. I mostly use the demo version in stand-alone (and then recombine in CS3) as it can handle larger images - but would almost certainly use the Photoshop plug-in when I buy the registered version.
I have decided to buy either the Home+ or the Pro+ edition - the deciding factor being the benefit of 16 bit processing in Neat Image? I would really appreciate knowing a bit more about how 16 bit processing works in Neat Image Pro+ and does 16 bit produce noticeably better results than 8 bit.
I would also appreciate a bit mor info on how Neat Image deals with different colour spaces?
Thanks,
Bruce
I've been using the demo version of Neat Image for some time and am really pleased with the results. I mostly use the demo version in stand-alone (and then recombine in CS3) as it can handle larger images - but would almost certainly use the Photoshop plug-in when I buy the registered version.
I have decided to buy either the Home+ or the Pro+ edition - the deciding factor being the benefit of 16 bit processing in Neat Image? I would really appreciate knowing a bit more about how 16 bit processing works in Neat Image Pro+ and does 16 bit produce noticeably better results than 8 bit.
I would also appreciate a bit mor info on how Neat Image deals with different colour spaces?
Thanks,
Bruce