Device profile quality - around what level should it typically be when doing things right and using a high-end monitor?
Posted: Tue May 19, 2020 11:42 am
I've made many attempts to surpass quality level 96% when creating a profile for a Sigma sd Quattro, but it's apparently impossible. Using version 8.5.2.
I consistently get either 96% or 95%, Fine Tuning Completeness 93%, and Very Low frequency value of 0.54, which gives the warning "The noise level seems to be somewhat higher than expected". I've tried with two high-end monitors. No details are present in the image area.
The maximum luminance uniformity I get is 96%. Cr and Cb are always 100%.
I don't have any complaint, I managed to get excellent results after all the filter settings tuning. I'm just wondering if the "extra 4%" could make any significant difference (but I suppose most probably not), and whether this is typical or not.
I consistently get either 96% or 95%, Fine Tuning Completeness 93%, and Very Low frequency value of 0.54, which gives the warning "The noise level seems to be somewhat higher than expected". I've tried with two high-end monitors. No details are present in the image area.
The maximum luminance uniformity I get is 96%. Cr and Cb are always 100%.
I don't have any complaint, I managed to get excellent results after all the filter settings tuning. I'm just wondering if the "extra 4%" could make any significant difference (but I suppose most probably not), and whether this is typical or not.