Neat Bench Results

questions about practical use of Neat Video, examples of use
Nologic
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2015 2:12 am

Post by Nologic » Tue Mar 21, 2017 4:40 am

CPU: Ryzen 1800x
RAM: 32GB @ 2133 :(
GPU: AMD R9 Fury
OS: Win 10 x64

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CPU only (1 core): 1.75 frames/sec
CPU only (2 cores): 3.76 frames/sec
CPU only (3 cores): 5.05 frames/sec
CPU only (4 cores): 6.8 frames/sec
CPU only (5 cores): 8.2 frames/sec
CPU only (6 cores): 9.43 frames/sec
CPU only (7 cores): 10.4 frames/sec
CPU only (8 cores): 11.2 frames/sec
CPU only (9 cores): 11.2 frames/sec
CPU only (10 cores): 11 frames/sec
CPU only (11 cores): 10.5 frames/sec
CPU only (12 cores): 10 frames/sec
CPU only (13 cores): 9.9 frames/sec
CPU only (14 cores): 9.43 frames/sec
CPU only (15 cores): 8.62 frames/sec
CPU only (16 cores): 8.55 frames/sec
GPU only (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series): 16.1 frames/sec
CPU (1 core) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series): 12.8 frames/sec
CPU (2 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series): 11.5 frames/sec
CPU (3 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series): 13.2 frames/sec
CPU (4 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series): 15.4 frames/sec
CPU (5 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series): 19.6 frames/sec
CPU (6 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series): 19.2 frames/sec
CPU (7 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series): 20 frames/sec
CPU (8 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series): 20.4 frames/sec
CPU (9 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series): 20 frames/sec
CPU (10 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series): 20 frames/sec
CPU (11 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series): 19.6 frames/sec
CPU (12 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series): 19.2 frames/sec
CPU (13 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series): 18.9 frames/sec
CPU (14 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series): 18.5 frames/sec
CPU (15 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series): 17.9 frames/sec
CPU (16 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series): 16.4 frames/sec

Best combination: CPU (8 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series)

Nologic
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2015 2:12 am

Post by Nologic » Fri Mar 31, 2017 10:28 pm

CPU: Ryzen 1800x
RAM: 32GB @ 2133 :(
GPU: AMD R9 Fury x2 (Crossfire)
OS: Win 10 x64

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CPU only (1 core): 1.87 frames/sec
CPU only (2 cores): 3.72 frames/sec
CPU only (3 cores): 5.43 frames/sec
CPU only (4 cores): 7.19 frames/sec
CPU only (5 cores): 8.47 frames/sec
CPU only (6 cores): 9.8 frames/sec
CPU only (7 cores): 11 frames/sec
CPU only (8 cores): 11.9 frames/sec
CPU only (9 cores): 11.6 frames/sec
CPU only (10 cores): 11.2 frames/sec
CPU only (11 cores): 11 frames/sec
CPU only (12 cores): 10.4 frames/sec
CPU only (13 cores): 10.1 frames/sec
CPU only (14 cores): 9.62 frames/sec
CPU only (15 cores): 9.01 frames/sec
CPU only (16 cores): 8.62 frames/sec
GPU only (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1): 14.7 frames/sec
GPU only (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 14.7 frames/sec
GPU only (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1, AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 22.2 frames/sec
CPU (1 core) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1): 11.9 frames/sec
CPU (2 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1): 11.8 frames/sec
CPU (3 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1): 13.7 frames/sec
CPU (4 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1): 15.9 frames/sec
CPU (5 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1): 17.9 frames/sec
CPU (6 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1): 18.9 frames/sec
CPU (7 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1): 19.2 frames/sec
CPU (8 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1): 19.6 frames/sec
CPU (9 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1): 19.6 frames/sec
CPU (10 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1): 19.2 frames/sec
CPU (11 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1): 18.9 frames/sec
CPU (12 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1): 19.2 frames/sec
CPU (13 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1): 18.9 frames/sec
CPU (14 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1): 18.5 frames/sec
CPU (15 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1): 18.2 frames/sec
CPU (16 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1): 16.4 frames/sec
CPU (1 core) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 12 frames/sec
CPU (2 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 11.6 frames/sec
CPU (3 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 13.7 frames/sec
CPU (4 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 15.9 frames/sec
CPU (5 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 17.5 frames/sec
CPU (6 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 18.9 frames/sec
CPU (7 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 19.2 frames/sec
CPU (8 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 19.2 frames/sec
CPU (9 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 19.2 frames/sec
CPU (10 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 19.2 frames/sec
CPU (11 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 18.9 frames/sec
CPU (12 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 18.5 frames/sec
CPU (13 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 18.5 frames/sec
CPU (14 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 18.2 frames/sec
CPU (15 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 17.9 frames/sec
CPU (16 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 16.1 frames/sec
CPU (2 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1, AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 21.3 frames/sec
CPU (3 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1, AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 15.4 frames/sec
CPU (4 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1, AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 20.8 frames/sec
CPU (5 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1, AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 21.3 frames/sec
CPU (6 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1, AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 21.3 frames/sec
CPU (7 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1, AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 21.3 frames/sec
CPU (8 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1, AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 22.2 frames/sec
CPU (9 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1, AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 21.3 frames/sec
CPU (10 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1, AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 21.7 frames/sec
CPU (11 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1, AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 21.3 frames/sec
CPU (12 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1, AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 21.3 frames/sec
CPU (13 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1, AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 20.4 frames/sec
CPU (14 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1, AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 20 frames/sec
CPU (15 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1, AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 19.2 frames/sec
CPU (16 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1, AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2): 18.5 frames/sec

Best combination: GPU only (AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #1, AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury Series #2)

Looks like the Fury needs more than PCI-E 8x to stretch it's legs (was expecting around 28fps)...I imagine it'll be even worse with Vega in Crossfire.

Still 22fps for $500 (pair of furys) isn't bad. :)

fartech
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:25 am

Post by fartech » Mon Apr 03, 2017 3:34 am

You might try disabling crossfire, and re-running the benchmark. Crossfire is great for gaming, but might hurt your bench #'s for OpenCL. Although splitting the pci-E lane's down to 4 per GPU processor may also be whats slowing you down.

Nologic
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2015 2:12 am

Post by Nologic » Tue Apr 04, 2017 1:18 am

Thanks for trying to lend a helping hand.

However the post above the Crossfire one, is the same system with only one card in, which gives 16fps by it's self, when using full PCI-E 16x.

Now when both cards are in the system, each only does 14fps...so a drop of 2fps...this I'm chalking up to the PCI-E 16x now being split to only 8x per GPU.

When combined they manage 22fps...so a loss of 6fps do to overhead of crossfire..and a loss of 4fps since both cards only have 8x each rather than 16x.

So a total loss of 10fps...out of a potential 32fps, do to overhead & bandwidth starvation...that is nearly 30% just gone.

That said I spent $500 on my CPU and it only got 12fps...I spent $500 on a pair of Fury's & got 22fps...which is nearly double the performance.

Who knows maybe performance will improve as BIOS revisions roll out for Ryzen...still I'm fairly happy with the performance I'm getting out of my getto-box. :)

fartech
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:25 am

Post by fartech » Tue Apr 04, 2017 6:24 am

It's a common misconception that OpenCL requires the cards be in crossfire mode to get both working. This is only true for gaming, but not for applications that use a plugin like Neat. I know I tried it with crossfire on and my FPS went to crap as well.

Nologic
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2015 2:12 am

Post by Nologic » Tue Apr 04, 2017 4:56 pm

Disabling Crossfire in the Global settings made no marked difference with the Fury's in my system.

It was certainly worth a try, and something others may want to check out. :)

Thanks for the suggestion.

Tim
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:54 am
Contact:

Post by Tim » Wed Apr 05, 2017 1:57 am

Nologic, thank you for sharing the results.

The difference in single-GPU performance between 1-GPU and 2-GPU setups is likely caused by the fact that you are reducing the number of PCIe lanes allocated per each GPU. Neat Video pumps a lot of data via PCIe and any decrease in throughput will impact the overall performance.

Some Intel CPUs have 40 PCIe lanes which allows simultaneous transfers to two PCIe3 x16 GPUs at full speed. Ryzen CPUs seem to have up to 24 lanes, which is only enough for transferring data to one GPU at full speed (or even to both GPUs at reduced rates). Do you have any BIOS settings controlling the allocation of PCIe lanes to GPUs (perhaps you can do 16+8 instead of 8+8)?
Image Image Neat Video team
noise reduction for video and photos

Nologic
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2015 2:12 am

Post by Nologic » Wed Apr 05, 2017 6:53 pm

Hi Tim,

Nah there isn't anything I can do really about the PCI-E stuff...AMD just went cheap with the PCI-E lanes...and well the Memory Controller.

Which sucks since I would have coughed up an extra $100 for a CPU with 40 lanes & a more well rounded memory controller.

That said I hope we see some other benches with SLI or Crossfire on Intel. Would be nice to see what kind of overhead they are experiencing.

I should pull out two of my sticks of ram to see what effect memory speed makes...since what I have will run @ 3200 if only two sticks are in the board...frigging cheap ass controller. :(

Raima
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2017 4:45 am

Post by Raima » Sat Dec 09, 2017 9:20 pm

CPU: i7 8700k
RAM: 32GB @ 2666
GPU: AMD RX Vega 64
OS: OS X High Sierra 10.13.2


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CPU only (1 core): 2.4 frames/sec
CPU only (2 cores): 4.88 frames/sec
CPU only (3 cores): 7.04 frames/sec
CPU only (4 cores): 9.35 frames/sec
CPU only (5 cores): 11.1 frames/sec
CPU only (6 cores): 12.7 frames/sec
CPU only (7 cores): 12.8 frames/sec
CPU only (8 cores): 12.5 frames/sec
CPU only (9 cores): 12 frames/sec
CPU only (10 cores): 11.4 frames/sec
CPU only (11 cores): 11 frames/sec
CPU only (12 cores): 10.3 frames/sec
GPU only (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 12.3 frames/sec
CPU (1 core) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 10.9 frames/sec
CPU (2 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 9.43 frames/sec
CPU (3 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 11.6 frames/sec
CPU (4 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 13.3 frames/sec
CPU (5 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 14.9 frames/sec
CPU (6 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 14.7 frames/sec
CPU (7 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 18.9 frames/sec
CPU (8 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 17.9 frames/sec
CPU (9 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 17.2 frames/sec
CPU (10 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 16.1 frames/sec
CPU (11 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 15.6 frames/sec
CPU (12 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 14.3 frames/sec

Best combination: CPU (7 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine)

s3rl0l
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed May 10, 2017 8:53 am

Post by s3rl0l » Mon Dec 11, 2017 11:20 am

Raima wrote:CPU: i7 8700k
RAM: 32GB @ 2666
GPU: AMD RX Vega 64
OS: OS X High Sierra 10.13.2


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CPU only (1 core): 2.4 frames/sec
CPU only (2 cores): 4.88 frames/sec
CPU only (3 cores): 7.04 frames/sec
CPU only (4 cores): 9.35 frames/sec
CPU only (5 cores): 11.1 frames/sec
CPU only (6 cores): 12.7 frames/sec
CPU only (7 cores): 12.8 frames/sec
CPU only (8 cores): 12.5 frames/sec
CPU only (9 cores): 12 frames/sec
CPU only (10 cores): 11.4 frames/sec
CPU only (11 cores): 11 frames/sec
CPU only (12 cores): 10.3 frames/sec
GPU only (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 12.3 frames/sec
CPU (1 core) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 10.9 frames/sec
CPU (2 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 9.43 frames/sec
CPU (3 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 11.6 frames/sec
CPU (4 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 13.3 frames/sec
CPU (5 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 14.9 frames/sec
CPU (6 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 14.7 frames/sec
CPU (7 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 18.9 frames/sec
CPU (8 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 17.9 frames/sec
CPU (9 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 17.2 frames/sec
CPU (10 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 16.1 frames/sec
CPU (11 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 15.6 frames/sec
CPU (12 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine): 14.3 frames/sec

Best combination: CPU (7 cores) and GPU (AMD Radeon HD Vega10 XT Prototype Compute Engine)
I thought that the Vega were not supported? Is this test done with FCPX?

fartech
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:25 am

Post by fartech » Fri Jan 19, 2018 5:35 am

CPU:i7 5960X (4.0Ghz)
RAM:32GB (4x4) Corsair DDR4 2400Mhz
GPU:GTX TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION
OS: Windows 10 Pro x64

Neat Bench (Neat Image 8.4.0, Neat Video 4.7.0) x64
Copyright (c) 1999-2017 Neat Image team, Neat Video team, ABSoft.
All Rights Reserved.

GPU detection log:

Looking for NVIDIA CUDA-capable devices...
CUDA driver version: 9010
NVIDIA CUDA initialized successfully.
Checking CUDA GPU #1:
GPU device name is: TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION
10169 MB available during initialization (12288 MB total)
Check passed - will attempt to use the device
Checking CUDA GPU #2:
GPU device name is: TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION
10169 MB available during initialization (12288 MB total)
Check passed - will attempt to use the device

Neat Video benchmark:

Frame Size: 1920x1080 progressive
Bitdepth: 8 bits per channel
Mix with Original: Disabled
Temporal Filter: Enabled
Quality Mode: Normal
Radius: 2 frames
Dust and Scratches: Disabled
Slow Shutter: Disabled
Spatial Filter: Enabled
Quality Mode: Normal
Frequencies High, Mid, Low
Artifact Removal: Enabled
Detail Recovery: Disabled
Edge Smoothing: Disabled
Sharpening: Disabled

Detecting the best combination of performance settings:
running the test data set on up to 16 CPU cores and on up to 2 GPUs
TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1: 10169 MB currently available (12288 MB total), using up to 100%
TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2: 10169 MB currently available (12288 MB total), using up to 100%

CPU only (1 core): 1.67 frames/sec
CPU only (2 cores): 3.51 frames/sec
CPU only (3 cores): 5.13 frames/sec
CPU only (4 cores): 6.8 frames/sec
CPU only (5 cores): 8.33 frames/sec
CPU only (6 cores): 9.43 frames/sec
CPU only (7 cores): 10.2 frames/sec
CPU only (8 cores): 10.5 frames/sec
CPU only (9 cores): 11 frames/sec
CPU only (10 cores): 12.3 frames/sec
CPU only (11 cores): 11.5 frames/sec
CPU only (12 cores): 11.8 frames/sec
CPU only (13 cores): 11.5 frames/sec
CPU only (14 cores): 12.3 frames/sec
CPU only (15 cores): 12.3 frames/sec
CPU only (16 cores): 12.3 frames/sec
GPU only (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1): 24.4 frames/sec
GPU only (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 24.4 frames/sec
GPU only (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1, TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 37 frames/sec
CPU (1 core) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1): 18.2 frames/sec
CPU (2 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1): 19.6 frames/sec
CPU (3 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1): 20 frames/sec
CPU (4 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1): 21.7 frames/sec
CPU (5 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1): 24.4 frames/sec
CPU (6 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1): 25 frames/sec
CPU (7 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1): 27.8 frames/sec
CPU (8 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1): 27.8 frames/sec
CPU (9 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1): 27 frames/sec
CPU (10 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1): 28.6 frames/sec
CPU (11 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1): 28.6 frames/sec
CPU (12 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1): 28.6 frames/sec
CPU (13 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1): 28.6 frames/sec
CPU (14 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1): 29.4 frames/sec
CPU (15 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1): 28.6 frames/sec
CPU (16 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1): 28.6 frames/sec
CPU (1 core) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 18.2 frames/sec
CPU (2 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 19.6 frames/sec
CPU (3 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 20.8 frames/sec
CPU (4 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 22.2 frames/sec
CPU (5 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 24.4 frames/sec
CPU (6 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 25.6 frames/sec
CPU (7 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 27.8 frames/sec
CPU (8 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 28.6 frames/sec
CPU (9 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 27.8 frames/sec
CPU (10 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 28.6 frames/sec
CPU (11 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 28.6 frames/sec
CPU (12 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 28.6 frames/sec
CPU (13 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 28.6 frames/sec
CPU (14 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 28.6 frames/sec
CPU (15 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 29.4 frames/sec
CPU (16 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 29.4 frames/sec
CPU (2 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1, TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 38.5 frames/sec
CPU (3 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1, TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 30.3 frames/sec
CPU (4 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1, TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 31.3 frames/sec
CPU (5 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1, TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 31.3 frames/sec
CPU (6 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1, TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 34.5 frames/sec
CPU (7 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1, TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 34.5 frames/sec
CPU (8 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1, TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 35.7 frames/sec
CPU (9 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1, TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 37 frames/sec
CPU (10 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1, TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 37 frames/sec
CPU (11 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1, TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 37 frames/sec
CPU (12 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1, TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 35.7 frames/sec
CPU (13 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1, TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 35.7 frames/sec
CPU (14 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1, TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 35.7 frames/sec
CPU (15 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1, TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 37 frames/sec
CPU (16 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1, TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2): 35.7 frames/sec

Best combination: CPU (2 cores) and GPU (TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #1, TITAN Xp COLLECTORS EDITION #2) :D

Post Reply