It's 10 minutes long, up to 10 tracks in vertical.
Lot's of cuts and transitions.
I have a ATI 4870 in my 8 core Mac Pro 2009 and 24GB Ram.
GPU isn't recognized by Neat Video.
But my best cpu combination is 15 (out of 16)...[/img]
Since it is ATI, it is used by FCPX itself, but not by NV (NV doesn't use ATI cards in this version). Something else is taxing the GPU then, FCPX or perhaps the output codec.
What happens if you discard the background-rendered data in timeline before exporting (to force FCPX and NV to actually re-render the clip during export)? Does that produce more CPU load when export goes over the clip with NV? Does it render (export) faster or even slower?
That's hard to say whether its faster or slower because I have to rerender the whole project and there are several effects, corrections and filters around that Neat clips. So there is no way to say it clearly.
If you discard the rendered data for that one clip then it will not be necessary to re-render everything. To discard for one clip you can simply adjust the filter settings in that clip.
I trashed all render files of this project and switched my codec from ProRes422 HQ to ProRes Standard because of archiving. I rerendered it with the command "render all". Now the export works correctly!
sorry for the silly question, i have downloaded the demo for fcpx but i can't find it my fcpx version 10.0.3. where can i find the neat video function?
Have you downloaded v3.1 available in Download page (v3.1 doesn't yet include support for FCPX) or v3.1.1 that is available from support [at] neatvideo.com on request?