It was a test build of the Vegas version. There was no Premiere (Win) version earlier but you can download v3.3 for Premiere (Win) and directly test it on your computer.
Vlad
OpenCL support?
My results with a new graphic card:
Video: Gigabyte GV-R927OC-2GD, AMD Catalyst 13.12 (default AMD OverDrive settings)
CPU: Intel i5-3570 (not OC)
Memory: 12 GB (G.Skill, 12800CL9, cheap not high-speed)
OS: Win7 64 bit
NeatVideo 3.5
Sony Vegas 12.0 build 770
Results GPU/GPU+CPU:
1080p, Radius=0 - 17.2/19.2
1080p, Radius=1 - 11.1/12.7
1080p, Radius=2 - 8.8/10.1
1080p, Radius=5 - 5.6/6.6
720p, Radius=0 - 33.3/34.5
720p, Radius=1 - 21.3/22.7
720p, Radius=2 - 16.4/18.2
720p, Radius=5 - 10.4/11.9
P.S. Too many topics with results for different systems. Still think that it would be nice to have one place for results. I'm going to create a web page with form where people can post their results and showing results by video card.
Video: Gigabyte GV-R927OC-2GD, AMD Catalyst 13.12 (default AMD OverDrive settings)
CPU: Intel i5-3570 (not OC)
Memory: 12 GB (G.Skill, 12800CL9, cheap not high-speed)
OS: Win7 64 bit
NeatVideo 3.5
Sony Vegas 12.0 build 770
Results GPU/GPU+CPU:
1080p, Radius=0 - 17.2/19.2
1080p, Radius=1 - 11.1/12.7
1080p, Radius=2 - 8.8/10.1
1080p, Radius=5 - 5.6/6.6
720p, Radius=0 - 33.3/34.5
720p, Radius=1 - 21.3/22.7
720p, Radius=2 - 16.4/18.2
720p, Radius=5 - 10.4/11.9
P.S. Too many topics with results for different systems. Still think that it would be nice to have one place for results. I'm going to create a web page with form where people can post their results and showing results by video card.
Since we continuously work to improve the performance, each update may show different results. Newer video drivers may be more efficient as well. These variables need to be taken into account in the global table to keep it relevant, otherwise its content will be out of date quite soon. Still, if you want to maintain such a table please do, that can be very useful for people selecting a new GPU.
Thank you,
Vlad
Thank you,
Vlad
I understand that Neat Video performance is varies and depend on many factors so the tool that can give you a very accurate performance value is not possible.
However, I think a tool that can give you an estimated performance value can be created. And this tool will be useful. Many people do not need an exact value.
For a few hours I've made a simple prototype:
http://fifonik.com/nv/
I have not tested it carefully so it can contain some errors or the DB schema is need to be changed/optimized.
However, the tool already works:
- it is possible to get results by selected criterias (I added my own results into DB);
- it is possible to add results into DB. Everybody are able to do this. Just press "Add results" button, select GPU, paste Neat Video optimize log into a textarea, optionally fill name/system info and press "Save" button.
However, I think a tool that can give you an estimated performance value can be created. And this tool will be useful. Many people do not need an exact value.
For a few hours I've made a simple prototype:
http://fifonik.com/nv/
I have not tested it carefully so it can contain some errors or the DB schema is need to be changed/optimized.
However, the tool already works:
- it is possible to get results by selected criterias (I added my own results into DB);
- it is possible to add results into DB. Everybody are able to do this. Just press "Add results" button, select GPU, paste Neat Video optimize log into a textarea, optionally fill name/system info and press "Save" button.
Thank you very much. I have added a couple of results from one of our machines.
I encourage other users to do the same - please post your Optimize logs in http://fifonik.com/nv/
Thank you,
Vlad
I encourage other users to do the same - please post your Optimize logs in http://fifonik.com/nv/
Thank you,
Vlad
Hi again,
Could you add the name of the GPU mentioned here to the list in the database?
Thank you,
Vlad
Could you add the name of the GPU mentioned here to the list in the database?
Thank you,
Vlad